This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Don't all __access_noerrno with stack protector from __tunables_init [BZ #21744]

From: Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>
To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 14:41:06 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't all __access_noerrno with stack protector from __tunables_init [BZ #21744]
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <20170716191924.GA7226@gmail.com> <7643d65d-839e-a85d-8a4f-30eada595887@linaro.org> <CAMe9rOrU5Wp=bZgOY=91dyEJHjW6SJ5HknOeS_92pTxukpFrhA@mail.gmail.com> <874luag5n4.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <6dc48782-60c3-cead-08c0-7e018e7eb9ef@linaro.org>

* Adhemerval Zanella:

> INLINE_SYCALL_CALL is the one that sets errno in fact.

Yes, you are right.

References:
- [PATCH] Don't all __access_noerrno with stack protector from __tunables_init [BZ #21744]
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH] Don't all __access_noerrno with stack protector from __tunables_init [BZ #21744]
  - From: Adhemerval Zanella
- Re: [PATCH] Don't all __access_noerrno with stack protector from __tunables_init [BZ #21744]
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH] Don't all __access_noerrno with stack protector from __tunables_init [BZ #21744]
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: [PATCH] Don't all __access_noerrno with stack protector from __tunables_init [BZ #21744]
  - From: Adhemerval Zanella

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]