This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 1/1] yesstr/nostr missing for Chinese language locale


Akhilesh Kumar <akhilesh.k@samsung.com> wrote:

> During Locale verification i observed that
> yesstr and nostr  are missing for Chinese language locale [LC_MESSAGES]
> for the Peoples Republic of China
>
> [BZ #21723]
>        * locales/zh_CN (LC_MESSAGES): add yesstr and nostr
>
> Signed-off-by: Akhilesh Kumar <akhilesh.k@samsung.com>
> ---
>  localedata/locales/zh_CN | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/localedata/locales/zh_CN b/localedata/locales/zh_CN
> index e4b4886..9a800eb 100644
> --- a/localedata/locales/zh_CN
> +++ b/localedata/locales/zh_CN
> @@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ END LC_TIME
>  LC_MESSAGES
>  yesexpr "<U005E><U005B><U002B><U0031><U0079><U0059><U662F><U005D>"
>  noexpr  "<U005E><U005B><U002D><U0030><U006E><U004E><U4E0D><U5426><U005D>"
> +yesstr  "<U662F>"
> +nostr   "<U6CA1><U6709>"
>  END LC_MESSAGES

That is:

+yesstr  "是"
+nostr   "没有"

I asked a colleague (Peng Wu <pwu@redhat.com>) who is a native speaker
of Chinese and he said the yesstr is OK but the nostr should be "不是".
I’ll commit that change with him as the author.

-- 
Mike FABIAN <mfabian@redhat.com>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]