This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] tunables: Add IFUNC selection and cache sizes


On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Rodriguez Bahena, Victor
<victor.rodriguez.bahena@intel.com> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: <libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org> on behalf of Siddhesh Poyarekar
> <siddhesh@gotplt.org>
> Date: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 at 9:36 AM
> To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, Adhemerval Zanella
> <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
> Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] tunables: Add IFUNC selection and cache sizes
>
>>On Tuesday 20 June 2017 07:11 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> Since ifunc and others are handled in the same name space, I have to
>>> make non_temporal_threshold, .. as well as ifunc x86 specific.  Will it
>>>be
>>> OK?
>>
>>I'm going to add ifunc selection for aarch64 soon, so it makes sense to
>>have that generic.  You could name the arch-specific tunables as
>>x86_non_temporal_threshold and so on.
>
> What does it mean arch-specific? ( haswell / skyline / ... )
>

It is x86 vs aarch64.


-- 
H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]