This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Synchronizing auxiliary mutex data


On Jun 20 2017, Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 10:21 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> On Jun 19 2017, Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > * We write to __owner only when in the critical section, with relaxed
>> > MO; we write TID after lock and 0 before unlock.  Those writes are
>> > ordered by the critical section.
>> 
>> How does it guarantee that the thread calling pthread_mutex_lock see the
>> change that the thread calling pthread_mutex_unlock did?
>
> I suppose you are referring to the writes?  If so, because of the
> unlock/lock synchronization.

But the fields are independent of the lock field.  How do the two cpus
keep their caches coherent?

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]