This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: Shadow Stack support in glibc


On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 4:21 AM, Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com> wrote:
> On 09/06/17 12:15, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>> On 09/06/17 12:13, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 2:05 AM, Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> fixing setjmp/longjmp is non-trivial since jmpbuf size is abi,
>>>> it may be possible to do without saving ssp into jmpbuf though.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Shadow stack is enabled at run-time only if all sources are compiled
>>> with shadow stack enabled compiler against shadow stack enabled
>>> glibc.  setjmp/longjmp are implemented with IFUNC, which uses
>>> the old setjmp/longjmp if shadow stack is off and uses the new
>>> setjmp/longjmp if shadow stack is on.
>>>
>>
>> that is not enough.
>>
>> jmpbuf may be used in user code independently of setjmp/longjmp.
>>
>>
>
> oh wait, are you saying shadow stack is a new abi
> and all libraries on the system need to be compiled
> for that abi?
>

Yes,  99% of codes just need to recompile.  If context functions
are used or jmpbuf is used independently of setjmp/longjmp,
enabling is needed.

-- 
H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]