This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Move wrappers to libm-compat-calls-auto
- From: "Gabriel F. T. Gomes" <gftg at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
- To: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 09:41:05 -0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Move wrappers to libm-compat-calls-auto
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1482781202-8156-1-git-send-email-gftg@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1701031728000.3458@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 17:31:59 +0000
Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> This patch series is OK on the understanding that a followup will merge
> the existing libm-compat-calls / libm-compat-calls-ldouble-yes into
> libm-compat-calls-auto, which can then be renamed libm-compat-calls.
> (w_lgamma_compatF and k_standardF have the same property as
> libm-compat-calls-auto - they should be built for the existing formats of
> float / double / long double, but not for any additional formats added to
> libm, even if those additional formats are supported in future as
> alternative long double formats. Presumably one of the float128 patches
> will add a compat variant of type-foreach that avoids building these
> functions for float128.)
>
I'll squash and push this series. I don't expect this followup to be
committed for 2.25, is that also your understanding?