This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] manual: Add new header and standards annotations.
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016, Rical Jasan wrote:
> To confirm the approved pieces for once I'm prepared to push the commit
> button, were you referring to only the chapters so far in this patch
> ([v2 3/5] {argp,arith,lang,string}.texi) or also the first two
> (patches)? [v2 1/5] has been OK'd, no other comments; [v2 2/5] also
> was, though a typo was pointed out in the commit message.
I'm referring to all patches or parts of patches that have been approved.
> On the topic of commit messages, How would you like me to write them if
> this patch goes in piecewise? Should the first one look how I submitted
> it in this patch and subsequent patches can refer back to it or
> duplicate it? Or should they be rewritten to be more specific for each
> commit (maybe if committed by file)?
The commit messages should be accurate in relation to the patch version
actually committed.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com