Re: [PATCHv3 1/4] ldbl-128: Rename 'long double' to '_Float128'

[Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>]

On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Paul E. Murphy wrote:

> On 08/30/2016 12:16 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Aug 2016, Paul E. Murphy wrote:
> > 
> >> Is there any objection to committing patches 1 and
> >> 2 once approved?
> > 
> > I don't intend to review patch 2 until patch 1 is in.
> > 
> 
> For my clarity, is the revised v3 patch 1 OK for commit?

Yes, given a followup to fix indentation in cases where we have

long double var = (expression
		   continued);

and so changing long double to _Float128 requires the following lines in 
the continued expression to be reindented (that appears twice in 
e_gammal_r.c, at least).

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com