This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH x86-64][BZ #20024] Fixed vector sincos/sincosf ABI

From: Andrew Senkevich <andrew dot n dot senkevich at gmail dot com>
To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
Cc: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 15:56:03 +0300
Subject: Re: [PATCH x86-64][BZ #20024] Fixed vector sincos/sincosf ABI
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <CAMXFM3tO0RGFjbrQaEV80rTCWmUy8LQjkZ7gRd9j+Q3YQ2+nAQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 20 dot 1606022247540 dot 9542 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <CAMXFM3vREvMPjBU23ZGV6eyNs-exwHGG6C2WE6N1MHf=CqbkvA at mail dot gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 20 dot 1606061404540 dot 15183 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <57560F10 dot 4040907 at redhat dot com>

2016-06-07 3:02 GMT+03:00 Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>:
> On 06/06/2016 10:08 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> C tests seem safer where possible.  For example: the existing functions
>> are said to take vectors of pointers.  Does that mean vectors of 8-byte
>> pointers for the 64-bit ABI and vectors of 4-byte pointers for x32?  If
>> so, a C test is more likely to get right that the ABI to test is different
>> in those cases.
>
> +1

Here is new version of patch with fixed implementations for x32 and
new C tests for sincos ABI.


--
WBR,
Andrew

Attachment: bz20024_new.patch
Description: Binary data

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH x86-64][BZ #20024] Fixed vector sincos/sincosf ABI
  - From: Andrew Senkevich
- Re: [PATCH x86-64][BZ #20024] Fixed vector sincos/sincosf ABI
  - From: Joseph Myers

References:
- Re: [PATCH x86-64][BZ #20024] Fixed vector sincos/sincosf ABI
  - From: Joseph Myers
- Re: [PATCH x86-64][BZ #20024] Fixed vector sincos/sincosf ABI
  - From: Andrew Senkevich
- Re: [PATCH x86-64][BZ #20024] Fixed vector sincos/sincosf ABI
  - From: Joseph Myers
- Re: [PATCH x86-64][BZ #20024] Fixed vector sincos/sincosf ABI
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]