This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 08 May 2016 14:17, Eric Neblock wrote: > I've been doing some kernel hacking and added some new flags to the > Linux kernel. I want to use these flags in userland without having to in > an additional header (<asm-generic/fcntl.h>) and even then, there are > conflicts, because almost everything is already defined. > > As such, I filed a feature request (20050) and was informed about > about the process to have compatibility. > > I've attached a patch that shouldn't break anything. Incidentally, > everything in the Linux Kernel matches what is done by glibc. > > If I need to provide any more information, then please let me know. it seems like your patch is reversed. please use the latest git instead of a release tarball. `git diff` will make sure it's formatted correctly. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |