Re: [PATCH v2] localedata: CLDRv29: update LC_ADDRESS.country_num values

[Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>]

On 12 Apr 2016 10:36, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Marko Myllynen <myllynen@redhat.com> writes:
> > On 2016-04-12 11:30, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >> Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> writes:
> >>> On 12 Apr 2016 10:17, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >>>> Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> writes:
> >>>>> On 12 Apr 2016 10:05, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >>>>>> Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> writes:
> >>>>>>> On 12 Apr 2016 09:53, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> writes:
> >>>>>>>>> --- a/localedata/locales/ca_AD
> >>>>>>>>> +++ b/localedata/locales/ca_AD
> >>>>>>>>> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ postal_fmt    "<U0025><U0066><U0025><U004E><U0025><U0061><U0025><U004E>/
> >>>>>>>>>  <U004E><U0025><U0063><U0025><U004E>"
> >>>>>>>>>  country_ab2 "<U0041><U0044>"
> >>>>>>>>>  country_ab3 "<U0041><U004E><U0044>"
> >>>>>>>>> -country_num 20
> >>>>>>>>> +country_num 020
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> This is a plain number so the leading zero is not significant.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> i documented this in the commit message
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> That doesn't make it correct.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> nor does it make it incorrect.  i've provided justification for the
> >>>>> change at this point.
> >>>>
> >>>> "Add leading 0 prefix" is not justification.
> >>>
> >>> like i already said, read the *commit message*.
> >> 
> >> I did.  No justification.
> >
> > Please reread it, there was justification.
> 
> "Other sources doing it wrong, too" is not a justification.

the "other sources" in this case are the standards.
sounds fine to me.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature