This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 09/17 v6] Work even with compilers hacked to enable -fstack-protector by default.


On 13 Mar 2016 15:16, Nix wrote:
> With all the machinery we just added, we can easily arrange to work even
> when the compiler passes in -fstack-protector automatically: all the
> necessary bits of glibc are always compiled with -fno-stack-protector
> now.
> 
> So tear out the check in configure, and add appropriate calls to
> -fno-stack-protector in tests that need them (largely those that use
> -nostdlib), since we don't yet have a __stack_chk_fail() that those
> tests can rely upon.  (GCC often provides one, but we cannot rely on
> this, especially not when bootstrapping.)

looks ok to me
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]