This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Improve generic strcspn performance


Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 03/28/2016 08:19 AM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> > + /* The inline functions are not used from GLIBC 2.24 and forward, however
> > +    they are required to provide the symbols through string-inlines.c
> > +    (if inlining is not possible for compatibility reasons).  */
> >  __STRING_INLINE size_t __strcspn_c1 (const char *__s, int __reject);
> >  __STRING_INLINE size_t
> >  __strcspn_c1 (const char *__s, int __reject)
>
> They could, however, be moved out of the installed header file and be given
> compatibility symbol versions.

I have several patches out for review that move all the inlines from string2.h 
to string/string-inlines.c for backwards compatibility and discontinue the complex
inlining of some code from string2.h so one no longer needs to worry about
accidental ABI changes.

See http://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/10936/ for the strcspn move (this builds on
http://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/10933/ and http://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/10934/).

What do you mean with "compatibility symbol versions"?

Wilco 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]