This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH 01/12] Configury support for --enable-stack-protector.
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
- To: Nix <nix at esperi dot org dot uk>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, carlos at redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 14:10:19 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] Configury support for --enable-stack-protector.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1455963826-21885-1-git-send-email-nix at esperi dot org dot uk> <1455963826-21885-2-git-send-email-nix at esperi dot org dot uk> <m21t87d5ki dot fsf at linux-m68k dot org> <87vb5jpp0n dot fsf at esperi dot org dot uk>
Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk> writes:
> On 20 Feb 2016, Andreas Schwab spake thusly:
>
>> Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk> writes:
>>
>>> +AC_ARG_ENABLE([stack-protector],
>>> + AC_HELP_STRING([--enable-stack-protector=@<:@yes|no|all|strong@:>@],
>>> + [Detect stack overflows in glibc functions with large string buffers, or in all glibc functions]),
>>
>> Please explain the meaning of the argument in the help string.
>
> It's... a bit much to explain the difference between
> --stack-protector=yes/all/strong in a configure help string without
> filling half the screen up with explanations, but I'll try!
It should just mention the connection to -fstack-protector.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."