This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH 4/5] localedata: CLDRv28: update LC_ADDRESS.lang_name translations
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:02:19 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] localedata: CLDRv28: update LC_ADDRESS.lang_name translations
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1454998387-26905-1-git-send-email-vapier at gentoo dot org> <1454998387-26905-4-git-send-email-vapier at gentoo dot org> <20160213002824 dot GA19416 at altlinux dot org> <20160213004931 dot GV7732 at vapier dot lan>
On 02/12/2016 07:49 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 13 Feb 2016 03:28, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 01:13:06AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> This updates a bunch of locales based on CLDR v28 data:
>>> be_BY: changing ÐÐÐÐÑÑÑÐÐÑ ÐÐÐÐ to ÐÐÐÐÑÑÑÐÐÑ
>>> bg_BG: changing ÐÑÐÐÐÑÑÐÐ ÐÐÐÐ to ÐÑÐÐÐÑÑÐÐ
>> [...]
>>> --- a/localedata/locales/be_BY
>>> +++ b/localedata/locales/be_BY
>>> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ country_num 112
>>> % BY
>>> country_car "<U0042><U0059>"
>>> % ÐÐÐÐÑÑÑÐÐÑ ÐÐÐÐ
>>> -lang_name "<U0431><U0435><U043B><U0430><U0440><U0443><U0441><U043A><U0430><U044F><U0020><U043C><U043E><U0432><U0430>"
>>> +lang_name "<U0431><U0435><U043B><U0430><U0440><U0443><U0441><U043A><U0430><U044F>"
>> [...]
>>> --- a/localedata/locales/bg_BG
>>> +++ b/localedata/locales/bg_BG
>>> @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ country_num 100
>>> country_car "<U0042><U0047>"
>>> country_isbn 954
>>> % ÐÑÐÐÐÑÑÐÐ ÐÐÐÐ
>>> -lang_name "<U0431><U044A><U043B><U0433><U0430><U0440><U0441><U043A><U0438><U0020><U0435><U0437><U0438><U043A>"
>>> +lang_name "<U0431><U044A><U043B><U0433><U0430><U0440><U0441><U043A><U0438>"
>>
>> All these comments are falling out of sync. BTW, they don't seem to
>> provide any information in addition to keywords they comment,
>> so what's the use of keeping such comments?
>
> i noted in an earlier message that i need to respin and throw away the
> comments because they are out of sync. this gets back to a previous
> conversation we had about using UTF-8 encoding in all the localedata
> files instead of ASCII. these <Uxxxx> encodings are a pita.
I think we should just use UTF-8.
What was the consensus the last time we talked about this?
Cheers,
Carlos.