This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Close down glibc-sc mailing list.
- From: Mark Brown <ms_brown at sbcglobal dot net>
- To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>, "Ryan S. Arnold" <ryan dot arnold at linaro dot org>, Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim dot kuvyrkov at linaro dot org>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, Paul Eggert <eggert at cs dot ucla dot edu>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:04:46 -0600
- Subject: Re: Close down glibc-sc mailing list.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <E1aLIs3-00021d-VR at fencepost dot gnu dot org> <569D7328 dot 5030502 at sbcglobal dot net> <569E9328 dot 2000403 at redhat dot com>
On 01/19/2016 01:48 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 01/18/2016 06:20 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> To: glibc-sc@gnu.org
> Given that the glibc steering committee is disbanded and no
> longer exists, do any of the stewards (project maintainers) object
> to the closing of glibc-sc@gnu.org?
>
> It is my opinion that all email discussions should be sent to
> libc-alpha@sourceware.org or to individual stewards as required.
I am +1 on the sentiment and direction.
As a pragmatic matter, I think that there are some preparatory,
diplomatic steps that would need to be taken first. given our past
experiences, walking FSF leadership through the changes (which I
think is needed to make this happen without misunderstandings or
drama there) before we do them is the logical next step.
Thoughts?
Mark
--
Mark Brown
ms_brown@sbcglobal.net