This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 01/18/2016 11:54 AM, Zack Weinberg wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org> wrote: >> >> As long as the ABI support is there, we can keep using the "separate >> malloc implementation" even if glibc doesn't cooperate by providing >> convenient headers to access it. > > Clarification: it will not be possible to link new executables against > the symbols in question. (This is what a "compat symbol" in glibc is - > available only to existing binaries, not to new invocations of ld.) Oh, with a linker script or other hackery, I'm sure I could make it available to new invocations of ld. It's just bytes.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |