This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] x86_64: memcpy/memmove family optimized with AVX512
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Andrew Senkevich <andrew dot n dot senkevich at gmail dot com>
- Cc: libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:52:34 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: memcpy/memmove family optimized with AVX512
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAMXFM3uGLiFE+pKPzFgWP6Sx4C3w2Ktd4w3+35O0Bj=B1s0naA at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMe9rOrTWce2vy0_OUWRH4FVRUSndpuSh2QpkmcMxgSBBEo0Fg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMXFM3tOe8UcRRoCQzLxHRt8o-azPQ=OJtHhFHGUDvsHAydoLQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMe9rOreWU8eqsSaQShEY9+=Z6ySOTX+H8DxcYoFNY3i9tHrhg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMXFM3tH1FHdigHdYHVQiYafJMOf1=7Fxc+B2H1v11BNYxDgHw at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMe9rOqeZtmz+LE5vbMSKJkid=7S4YmwR4=AzfuDFO07G6uF+w at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMXFM3t9Y_YE_2zmPUr-agpMwhxk24OuU4QwY-zuWs-NKDEezA at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Andrew Senkevich
<andrew.n.senkevich@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2016-01-14 1:26 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>:
>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Andrew Senkevich
>> <andrew.n.senkevich@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 2016-01-13 23:20 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>:
>>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Andrew Senkevich
>>>> <andrew.n.senkevich@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Please add _chk tests.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is updated patch:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It won't apply:
>>>>
>>>> gnu-6:pts/19[19]> patch -p1 < /tmp/get-raw-msg.txt
>>>> patching file sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/Makefile
>>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 7.
>>>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>>>> sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/Makefile.rej
>>>> patching file sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/ifunc-impl-list.c
>>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 24.
>>>> patch: **** malformed patch at line 87: libc_ifunc_impl *array,
>>>>
>>>> Please use attachment or create a branch in glibc git.
>>>
>>> Please try attached.
>>
>> Look good to me.
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> Here is the version with a little bit faster non-temporal loops.
>
OK.
Thanks.
--
H.J.