This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: glibc 2.23 --- Release management and plan dates
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 09:14:37 -0800
- Subject: Re: glibc 2.23 --- Release management and plan dates
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <568C0BF4 dot 9000206 at linaro dot org> <CAMe9rOqs8vKkW6L8GLNFJPjBLQvVN2BRQZpzqXQNJJbjnH4Y3Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <568D47BC dot 60809 at linaro dot org> <CAMe9rOp-QEOdqUTgPtda=z22+N15MBtSX2TUdOxnUpodCtndPQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <568D4A82 dot 8030103 at linaro dot org>
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Adhemerval Zanella
<adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 06-01-2016 15:01, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Adhemerval Zanella
>> <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06-01-2016 14:42, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Adhemerval Zanella
>>>> <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>> As discussed in IRC channel with Carlos O'Donnel I volunteered myself as
>>>>> the release manager for upcoming 2.23 version.
>>>>>
>>>>> We also discussed briefly with the dates for the slush/soft and hard
>>>>> freeze and initial plan is:
>>>>>
>>>>> * Jan 11th is the soft/slush freeze.
>>>>> * Jan 18th is the hard freeze.
>>>>> * Feb 18th is release date.
>>>>>
>>>>> As usual please update the release wiki [1] with blockers and desirables
>>>>> features. I would like also to ask you to start preparations for build
>>>>> and test issues updates for wiki completion.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to push
>>>>
>>>> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2015-12/msg00281.html
>>>> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2015-12/msg00282.html
>>>>
>>>> into 2.23.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Do you see it as a blocker or a desirable feature?
>>
>> It is a desirable feature and I have been pinging them for weeks.
>>
>
> Right, I will check this out.
Thanks.
--
H.J.