This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Utilize vector math functions w/o -fopenmp


On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 16:45 +0300, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
> 2015-12-18 1:44 GMT+03:00 Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com>:
> > On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 20:27 +0300, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
> >> 2015-12-04 18:46 GMT+03:00 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>:
> >> diff --git a/sysdeps/x86/fpu/bits/math-vector.h
> >> b/sysdeps/x86/fpu/bits/math-vector.h
> >> index f3bfb86..13d720e 100644
> >> --- a/sysdeps/x86/fpu/bits/math-vector.h
> >> +++ b/sysdeps/x86/fpu/bits/math-vector.h
> >> @@ -28,6 +28,12 @@
> >>  # if defined _OPENMP && _OPENMP >= 201307
> >>  /* OpenMP case.  */
> >>  #  define __DECL_SIMD_x86_64 _Pragma ("omp declare simd notinbranch")
> >> +# elif __GNUC_PREREQ (6,0)
> >> +/* W/o OpenMP use GCC 6.* __attribute__((__simd__)).  */
> >> +#  define __DECL_SIMD_x86_64 __attribute__((__simd__("notinbranch")))
> >> +# endif
> >> +
> >> +# ifdef __DECL_SIMD_x86_64
> >>  #  undef __DECL_SIMD_cos
> >>  #  define __DECL_SIMD_cos __DECL_SIMD_x86_64
> >>  #  undef __DECL_SIMD_cosf
> >
> > I believe this might be what breaks a build on a recent GCC:
> >
> > ../math/bits/mathcalls.h:63:1: error: wrong number of arguments
> > specified for â__simd__â attribute
> >  __MATHCALL_VEC (cos,, (_Mdouble_ __x));
> >
> > Or perhaps GCC has a bug.  Could somebody have a look please?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> do you use trunk GCC?

Yes, "recent GCC" was supposed to mean GCC trunk from yesterday or so.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]