This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 10/11/15 18:47, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:i guess that's ok.[...]new aliases (for _FloatN and _FloatNx) mean a lot of new symbols and the new functions (or old ones with stricter semantics) can add a lot of code size. embedded systems might not be happy about this.Are you saying that you personally are OK with these APIs for glibc, but suppose that hypothetically some other people might object on grounds of code size?
yes (others might also object because of the maintenance burden). i haven't counted but i think there are >150 new math functions in part 2 and part 4 (considering float, double and long double) which i think is significant enough to justify my hypothesis.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |