This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 22 Oct 2015 11:13, Rich Felker wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 01:49:36PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i've created a C.UTF-8 page where i've tried to gather all the points > > people made in this thread: > > https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Proposals/C.UTF-8 > > On the wiki I see, under differences from C: > > - LC_COLLATE: Sort using the Unicode codepoint > > But this does not seem to be a difference. Unicode codepoint order is > identical to UTF-8 code unit order as unsigned char, i.e. the same as > the C locale. i was thinking of overlong encodings, but i guess those are technically invalid according to the spec. i think it's still worth calling out in the doc, but we can include an aside that highlights things. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |