This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Can we assume __thread support?
- From: Samuel Thibault <samuel dot thibault at ens-lyon dot org>
- To: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:05:55 +0200
- Subject: Re: Can we assume __thread support?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <561FB294 dot 1010602 at redhat dot com> <CAMe9rOq9-oN_gdWReP6ZgCfLpj_SPzdOB7OqfGhJzdX2ryCBGw at mail dot gmail dot com> <561FBD81 dot 7060903 at redhat dot com> <20151015145653 dot GA28313 at var dot bordeaux dot inria dot fr> <561FBF22 dot 4050508 at redhat dot com>
Florian Weimer, le Thu 15 Oct 2015 16:58:42 +0200, a écrit :
> On 10/15/2015 04:56 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Florian Weimer, le Thu 15 Oct 2015 16:51:45 +0200, a écrit :
> >> This is mainly a Hurd/NaCl question anyway, the NPTL-based platforms
> >> support it.
> >
> > Hurd supports it (since when Ulrich made it mandatory, basically).
>
> This is good news, thanks. I will remove the weird
> tsd_setspecific/tsd_getspecific macros and the infrastructure to support it.
I forgot to mention that the hurd support for TLS is not in master yet,
so you will see mentions of "threadvar" here and there. Just drop what
you need to drop, we will merge these changes into our tree with TLS
support.
Samuel