This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: posix_fallocate / How to go from a POSIX interpretation # to Austin Group Bug ID?
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs dot nagy at arm dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:38:04 -0400
- Subject: Re: posix_fallocate / How to go from a POSIX interpretation # to Austin Group Bug ID?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <560AD5F4 dot 6060805 at redhat dot com> <560BB691 dot 8030700 at arm dot com>
On 09/30/2015 06:16 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 29/09/15 19:18, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> In working on posix_fallocate recently I noticed that for Issue 7
>> the wording for EINVAL had been changed.
>>
>> The Issue 7 text says:
>> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/posix_fallocate.html
>> ~~~
>> Issue 7
>>
>> Austin Group Interpretations 1003.1-2001 #022, #024, and #162 are applied, changing the definition of the [EINVAL] error.
>> ~~~
>>
>> Is there any way to go from those interpretation #s to Austin Group Bug
>> numbers (http://austingroupbugs.net/main_page.php)?
>>
>
> https://collaboration.opengroup.org/austin/interps/documents.php
>
> it's a pain to use..
>
> https://collaboration.opengroup.org/austin/interps/documents/4882/AI-022.txt
> https://collaboration.opengroup.org/austin/interps/documents/4885/AI-024.txt
> https://collaboration.opengroup.org/austin/interps/documents/14574/AI-162.txt
Thanks! I saw your email after I sent mine :-)
c.