This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][BZ 18960] setlocale.c: Mark *_used symbols as unaligned.


On 09/28/2015 05:17 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 28 Sep 2015 16:52, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> On 09/28/2015 04:18 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
>>> Can you explain how/why you think this is needed? char has no
>>> alignment requirements (inherently) so as far as I can tell, the
>>> compiler may not make any alignment assumptions about an extern object
>>> of type char.
>>
>> s390(x) expects all top-level objects in the data segment to be aligned
>> to at least 2.  As far as I can tell, this is not explicitly mentioned
>> in the psABI supplement, but it is heavily implied by .align directives
>> and use of the lalr instruction.
> 
> how does that bubble in here though ?

The value of a weak symbol is used as flag, to determine that a
particular piece of code has been linked in.  If the object file is
pulled in by other code, the symbol is defined with an absolute address.

> does locale/localeinfo.h need to update
> _NL_CURRENT_DEFINE to use helpers from libc-symbols.h ?  this seems to be
> patching a single symptom point rather than addressing the source.

I'm not sure if this occurs in other places.

-- 
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]