This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [RFCv2] Dynamic lock elision support
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: munroesj at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com, "Paul E. Murphy" <murphyp at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: OndÅej BÃlka <neleai at seznam dot cz>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, Steve Munroe <sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com>, stli at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 23:07:36 -0400
- Subject: Re: [RFCv2] Dynamic lock elision support
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <55D358D8 dot 7020303 at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com> <55D3615F dot 1020300 at linaro dot org> <55E4A9E7 dot 3030700 at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com> <55E746D2 dot 7070309 at redhat dot com> <1441292934 dot 5575 dot 18 dot camel at oc7878010663> <20150903195159 dot GA18854 at domone> <1441311795 dot 5575 dot 31 dot camel at oc7878010663>
On 09/03/2015 04:23 PM, Steven Munroe wrote:
> The community via Carlos et al is asking for a larger discussion about
> tunables in general.
Kicked off the discussion to allow patches that accept GLIBC_*
namespace env vars to operate as-if they were tunables.
https://www.sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2015-09/msg00130.html
c.