This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: glibc 2.22 --- Machines that need testing.

From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf at ezchip dot com>
To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>, David Holsgrove <david dot holsgrove at xilinx dot com>, Thomas Schwinge <thomas at codesourcery dot com>, David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>, Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 12:43:51 -0400
Subject: Re: glibc 2.22 --- Machines that need testing.
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp dot mailfrom=cmetcalf at ezchip dot com;
References: <55C0D7F9 dot 5010907 at redhat dot com> <55C0E3E4 dot 80300 at tilera dot com> <55C0EB3B dot 2000302 at redhat dot com>
Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23

On 08/04/2015 12:41 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:

On 08/04/2015 12:10 PM, Chris Metcalf wrote:

On 08/04/2015 11:19 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:

Chris,

Is testing for TILEPro still something that you do?

I cross-built TILEPro just now, and fixed a -Werror issue that had
cropped up since the last time I tried.

Running tests for TILEPro would take substantially more effort than
my existing testing for TILE-Gx, just because I don't have any of the
test infrastructure set up at the moment.

Nonetheless, my sense is that TILEPro is still likely in OK shape,
since it shares so much of its infrastructure with TILE-Gx (in
particular tilegx32, which is also a 32-bit target).

Could you please document that assertion in the wiki under TILEPro?

Just a sentence about no testing this release, but confidence in
the TILE-Gx testing.


I forgot to mention I had already updated the wiki to describe my
build environment success, and to say I had not run "make check".

I think I will omit my optimistic assertions about how likely things
are to Just Work; I need to try to keep my native optimism more
in check :-)

--
Chris Metcalf, EZChip Semiconductor
http://www.ezchip.com

References:
- glibc 2.22 --- Machines that need testing.
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: glibc 2.22 --- Machines that need testing.
  - From: Chris Metcalf
- Re: glibc 2.22 --- Machines that need testing.
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]