This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] powerpc: New feature - HWCAP/HWCAP2 bits in the TCB
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel at redhat dot com>
- To: OndÅej BÃlka <neleai at seznam dot cz>
- Cc: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:13:00 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: New feature - HWCAP/HWCAP2 bits in the TCB
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <55760314 dot 6070601 at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com> <5576FC80 dot 1090806 at arm dot com> <1433862393 dot 21101 dot 9 dot camel at sjmunroe-ThinkPad-W500> <5591239A dot 9030907 at twiddle dot net> <1435603025 dot 5485 dot 23 dot camel at oc7878010663> <20150629211831 dot GA23965 at domone> <5591BD23 dot 6090501 at linaro dot org> <20150630031409 dot GA28953 at domone> <5592A310 dot 9010902 at linaro dot org> <20150630211515 dot GA26880 at domone>
On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 23:15 +0200, OndÅej BÃlka wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:09:20AM -0300, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> > Seriously, you need to start admitting your lack of knowledge in PowerISA
> > (I am meant addition instead of multiplication, my mistake). And repeating
> > myself to prove a point only makes you childish, I am not competing with
> > you.
> >
> It sound exactly as silly as your critique that was based on lie. Now
> you are saying: Oops my mistake. But I was rigth. To see if one is rigth
> or wrong is to present evidence. So whats yours?
Please, let's all stick to the technical discussion here. While we may
disagree on what we think is best for glibc, I think it would help if
we'd just assume that everyone tries to just do the best for glibc.
Thanks.