Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] bugfix for aarch64 ILP32

[Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor dot zhangjian at huawei dot com>]

On 2015/3/24 0:02, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 03/19/2015 12:19 AM, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
>> On 2015/3/19 0:08, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>>> On 03/18/2015 06:30 AM, Zhang Jian(Bamvor) wrote:
>>>> This is bamvor from Huawei OS team. We test ILP32 support through
>>>> LTP testcases for both little endian and big endian. There are some
>>>> failures we thought they should be fixed in glibc level, so, here they are.
>>>
>>> Your changes are legally significant, and will require copyright assignment
>>> from Huawei. Are you working on getting copyright assignment? I don't presently
>>> see Huawei assignments for glibc (but I do see them for gcc).
>>>
>>> Please review the contribution checklist:
>>> https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Contribution%20checklist
>> Hi, Carlos
>>
>> I do not know the exactly status about this assignment, and I try to collect
>> the status in huawei. Meanwhile I read the link above. It say "A change of
>> just a few lines (less than 15 or so) is not legally significant for
>> copyright." Our patch may be less 15 line because of the second may be
>> useless according to H,J Lu's suggestion.
>>
>> Meanwhile, I found that there is not s-o-b in glibc git commit. Should we
>> remove the s-o-b in my patches as well?
> 
> If your total contributions is below say ~15 lines [1], then we can accept
> it *for* *today*, but if you continue to contribute the number of lines
> changed is cumulative by author. Please pursue the appropriate path forward
> to get copyright assignment, that way we can just accept any patch you post
> regardless of length.
Thanks. I will learn about the assignment in our company when I am working on
the patch.
> Thank you for contributing :-)
It is my honor.

regards

bamvor
> 
> Cheers,
> Carlos.
> 
> [1] https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Legally-Significant.html#Legally-Significant
> 
> .
>