This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] ARM64: ILP32: use __fsword_t in generic/bits/statfs.h

From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf at ezchip dot com>
To: Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor dot zhangjian at huawei dot com>
Cc: "Pinski, Andrew" <Andrew dot Pinski at caviumnetworks dot com>, "libc-alpha at sourceware dot org" <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, "apinski at cavium dot com" <apinski at cavium dot com>, "yangyingliang at huawei dot com" <yangyingliang at huawei dot com>, "bintian dot wang at huawei dot com" <bintian dot wang at huawei dot com>, "dingtianhong at huawei dot com" <dingtianhong at huawei dot com>, <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:39:02 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] ARM64: ILP32: use __fsword_t in generic/bits/statfs.h
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
Authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
References: <1426674611-26427-1-git-send-email-bamvor dot zhangjian at huawei dot com> <1426674611-26427-3-git-send-email-bamvor dot zhangjian at huawei dot com>,<550AFBE6 dot 1000402 at ezchip dot com> <405BEB99-764E-474B-A3E0-7225FDE6596C at caviumnetworks dot com> <550B007A dot 9090407 at ezchip dot com> <550B95D4 dot 6020405 at huawei dot com> <550C225B dot 6000802 at ezchip dot com> <550F7CBC dot 8070403 at huawei dot com>

On 03/22/2015 10:38 PM, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:

I assume you are planning to push all this stuff to glibc via Marcus or
>some other ARM maintainer, so I don't need to push this for you. Let me
>know if that's not the case.

Well, it sounds that it is not this case. This patch does not depend on the
aarch64 ilp32 patch from Andrew and does not depend on any aarch64 specific
code either. While the other two patches of mine depend on Andrew's ILP32
patches.
It would be great this single patch could be applied first.


OK.  Please repost with an appropriate ChangeLog entry and I can
commit for you.  I don't know if you've done the commit paperwork
but in any case I would say this patch counts as legally trivial.

Thanks.

--
Chris Metcalf, EZChip Semiconductor
http://www.ezchip.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] ARM64: ILP32: use __fsword_t in generic/bits/statfs.h
  - From: Bamvor Jian Zhang

References:
- [RFC PATCH 0/3] bugfix for aarch64 ILP32
  - From: Zhang Jian(Bamvor)
- [RFC PATCH 2/3] ARM64: ILP32: use __fsword_t in generic/bits/statfs.h
  - From: Zhang Jian(Bamvor)
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] ARM64: ILP32: use __fsword_t in generic/bits/statfs.h
  - From: Chris Metcalf
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] ARM64: ILP32: use __fsword_t in generic/bits/statfs.h
  - From: Pinski, Andrew
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] ARM64: ILP32: use __fsword_t in generic/bits/statfs.h
  - From: Chris Metcalf
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] ARM64: ILP32: use __fsword_t in generic/bits/statfs.h
  - From: Bamvor Jian Zhang
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] ARM64: ILP32: use __fsword_t in generic/bits/statfs.h
  - From: Chris Metcalf
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] ARM64: ILP32: use __fsword_t in generic/bits/statfs.h
  - From: Bamvor Jian Zhang

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]