This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Silence resolver logging for DNAME records when DNSSEC is enabled


On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:10:41AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Can we remove the logging altogether?  Or at least for the
> RES_USE_DNSSEC case?
> 
> The DO bit essentially means, âI'm fine with receiving unknown RR
> typesâ, it's not really related to DNSSEC.  The reason for that is the
> fact that the DNSSEC protocol was changed twice (once for DNSSECbis,
> which is completely unrecognizable to the previous implementation, and
> once for NSEC3), and the flag was reused.
> 
> So unless there is a compelling reason for logging this information,
> I'd say just remove it.

Thanks for the context.  I wasn't sure about removing the logging
altogether, but if it is going to be such a pain for DNSSEC, we might
as well silence it.  How is this then?

Siddhesh

	[BZ #14841]
	* resolv/gethnamaddr.c (getanswer): Skip logging if
	RES_USE_DNSSEC is set.
	* resolv/nss_dns/dns-host.c (getanswer_r): Likewise.
 
diff --git a/resolv/gethnamaddr.c b/resolv/gethnamaddr.c
index a861a84..0fe2ad9 100644
--- a/resolv/gethnamaddr.c
+++ b/resolv/gethnamaddr.c
@@ -331,23 +331,16 @@ getanswer (const querybuf *answer, int anslen, const char *qname, int qtype)
 			buflen -= n;
 			continue;
 		}
-		if ((type == T_SIG) || (type == T_KEY) || (type == T_NXT)) {
-			/* We don't support DNSSEC yet.  For now, ignore
-			 * the record and send a low priority message
-			 * to syslog.
-			 */
-			syslog(LOG_DEBUG|LOG_AUTH,
-	       "gethostby*.getanswer: asked for \"%s %s %s\", got type \"%s\"",
-			       qname, p_class(C_IN), p_type(qtype),
-			       p_type(type));
-			cp += n;
-			continue;
-		}
 		if (type != qtype) {
-			syslog(LOG_NOTICE|LOG_AUTH,
+			/* Log a low priority message if we get an unexpected
+			 * record, but skip it if we are using DNSSEC.
+			 */
+			if ((_res.options & RES_USE_DNSSEC) == 0) {
+				syslog(LOG_NOTICE|LOG_AUTH,
 	       "gethostby*.getanswer: asked for \"%s %s %s\", got type \"%s\"",
-			       qname, p_class(C_IN), p_type(qtype),
-			       p_type(type));
+					qname, p_class(C_IN), p_type(qtype),
+					p_type(type));
+			}
 			cp += n;
 			continue;		/* XXX - had_error++ ? */
 		}
diff --git a/resolv/nss_dns/dns-host.c b/resolv/nss_dns/dns-host.c
index f715ab0..5afc955 100644
--- a/resolv/nss_dns/dns-host.c
+++ b/resolv/nss_dns/dns-host.c
@@ -820,26 +820,18 @@ getanswer_r (const querybuf *answer, int anslen, const char *qname, int qtype,
 	  linebuflen -= n;
 	  continue;
 	}
-      if (__builtin_expect (type == T_SIG, 0)
-	  || __builtin_expect (type == T_KEY, 0)
-	  || __builtin_expect (type == T_NXT, 0))
-	{
-	  /* We don't support DNSSEC yet.  For now, ignore the record
-	     and send a low priority message to syslog.  */
-	  syslog (LOG_DEBUG | LOG_AUTH,
-	       "gethostby*.getanswer: asked for \"%s %s %s\", got type \"%s\"",
-		  qname, p_class (C_IN), p_type(qtype), p_type (type));
-	  cp += n;
-	  continue;
-	}
 
       if (type == T_A && qtype == T_AAAA && map)
 	have_to_map = 1;
       else if (__glibc_unlikely (type != qtype))
 	{
-	  syslog (LOG_NOTICE | LOG_AUTH,
-	       "gethostby*.getanswer: asked for \"%s %s %s\", got type \"%s\"",
-		  qname, p_class (C_IN), p_type (qtype), p_type (type));
+	  /* Log a low priority message if we get an unexpected record, but
+	     skip it if we are using DNSSEC.  */
+	  if ((_res.options & RES_USE_DNSSEC) == 0)
+	    syslog (LOG_NOTICE | LOG_AUTH,
+		    "gethostby*.getanswer: asked for \"%s %s %s\", "
+		    "got type \"%s\"",
+		    qname, p_class (C_IN), p_type (qtype), p_type (type));
 	  cp += n;
 	  continue;			/* XXX - had_error++ ? */
 	}

Attachment: pgp5pbi2nL5xj.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]