This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] Fix for heap overflow in wscanf (BZ 16618)


Carlos O'Donell wrote:
I'd read the POSIX wording differently.

Although Rich's interpretation is correct for current POSIX, thanks to Eric Blake the next release of POSIX (Issue 8) is planned to change this, and to require 'free' to leave errno alone, which as I understand it is your preferred interpretation. Please see:

http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=385

Because of this, glibc 'free' should not set errno if the user invokes 'free' in a conforming way. Setting errno will be a conformance bug once Issue 8 comes out, and glibc should be fixed to conform well before that. Also, the glibc documentation should be changed to discuss this issue. I have filed a glibc bug report to that effect, here:

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17924


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]