This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: GNU C LIbrary 2.21 freeze date -- January 9th.
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: Adhemerval Zanella <azanella at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:13:49 -0500
- Subject: Re: GNU C LIbrary 2.21 freeze date -- January 9th.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <54AC3FB0 dot 4040701 at redhat dot com> <54AD707E dot 7080006 at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com> <54B316A9 dot 9010800 at redhat dot com>
On 01/11/2015 07:34 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 01/07/2015 12:44 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>> On 06-01-2015 18:04, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>>> Does anyone object to a freeze date of January 9th, this friday?
>>>
>>> Please see the release page for more details:
>>> https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.21
>>>
>>> Desired blockers should be up and on that page, and I'll be
>>> reviewing them shortly.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Carlos.
>>>
>> I am fine with this date and I have update the release wiki.
>
> Thanks.
>
>> For this
>> release I would like to push
>>
>> * New POSIX-compliance '''fmemopen''': I sent it on last release, but
>> since it was near the closing date, I postpone to this one. I really
>> would like to push it on 2.21
>> * https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-12/msg00226.html
>> * https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-12/msg00227.html
>
> Please get these reviewed and checked in ASAP.
I take this back. This has ABI implications from the symbol versioning.
Please move this to 2.22. I don't want to do a last minute review and rush
an ABI change.
c.