This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] sh: Use generic lowlevellock-futex.h.
- From: Kaz Kojima <kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>
- To: triegel at redhat dot com
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 21:43:18 +0900 (JST)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh: Use generic lowlevellock-futex.h.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1418856067 dot 20194 dot 7 dot camel at triegel dot csb> <20141218 dot 092804 dot 179811418 dot kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp> <1418898832 dot 1025 dot 13 dot camel at triegel dot csb>
Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com> wrote:
>> I definitely agree with your view about the custom asm. Switch to
>> the generic C implementation would be simply fine and the way to go.
>
> Does that mean I can simply commit a patch that removes the custom
> lowlevellock.h, or do you want to test this further before this is
> committed?
There are sh custom asm files depends on the custom lowlevellock.h.
The files below should be removed from sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sh/
at the same time.
lowlevellock.h
lowlevellock.S
lowlevelrobustlock.S
libc-lowlevellock.S
pthread_barrier_wait.S
pthread_cond_broadcast.S
pthread_cond_signal.S
pthread_cond_timedwait.S
pthread_cond_wait.S
pthread_rwlock_rdlock.S
pthread_rwlock_timedrdlock.S
pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock.S
pthread_rwlock_unlock.S
pthread_rwlock_wrlock.S
sem_post.S
sem_timedwait.S
sem_trywait.S
sem_wait.S
I'd like to pre-approve the patch removing them all.
Regards,
kaz