This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Subsystem maintainers
- From: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 11:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: Subsystem maintainers
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1409232040060 dot 8132 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1409301439570 dot 15186 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <542AC26E dot 5070906 at redhat dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1410071615260 dot 28196 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1410131134410 dot 20836 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1410201529370 dot 12154 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk>
> Should I take it that we have consensus on the idea of subsystem
> maintainers, with me as such a maintainer for soft-fp and the conform/
> tests? (I don't think anyone commented on me as a maintainer for the math
> component.)
I'm fine with all that, including math.