This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[PATCH v2] lowlevellock comments
- From: Bernard Ogden <bernie dot ogden at linaro dot org>
- To: carlos at redhat dot com
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, Bernard Ogden <bernie dot ogden at linaro dot org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 16:39:18 +0100
- Subject: [PATCH v2] lowlevellock comments
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <54257E64 dot 1030006 at redhat dot com>
Hi Carlos,
Thanks for the review. I think I've addressed all the comments - more specific
responses inline below, v2 of patch even further below.
Regards,
Bernie
On 26 September 2014 15:55, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 09/26/2014 07:55 AM, Bernard Ogden wrote:
> Shouldn't this be "until thread terminates or the wait times out."?
Yep, fixed.
> Please verify the kernel does not use the private futex operations for this,
> and when complete come back and update the comment to say:
>
> "As of kernel X.Y.Z, the private futex operation is not used."
IIUC, the comment is still correct - the relevant code being this snippet
(kernel/fork.c:817 in linux-stable):
if (tsk->clear_child_tid) {
if (!(tsk->flags & PF_SIGNALED) &&
atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) > 1) {
/*
* We don't check the error code - if userspace has
* not set up a proper pointer then tough luck.
*/
put_user(0, tsk->clear_child_tid);
sys_futex(tsk->clear_child_tid, FUTEX_WAKE,
1, NULL, NULL, 0);
}
tsk->clear_child_tid = NULL;
}
(FUTEX_WAKE without an explicit private flag meaning shared.)
I've made the comments for lll_timedwait_tid (lowlevellock.c) and lll_wait_tid
(lowlevellock.h) more consistent and hopefully therefore clearer.
Is your form of words the idiom for this? - to me it suggests that the private
futex operation went out of use in that kernel version, so I changed it a
little.
>> return oldval;
>>
>> + /* Put lock into contended state. */
>
> Suggest: "Attempt to put lock into contended state."
Changed to "Attempt to put lock into state locked with waiters" - on the
principle of using consistent terminology everywhere.
>> + /* Put lock into contended state. */
>
> Suggest: "Attempt to put lock into contended state."
Changed to "Attempt to put lock into state locked with waiters" - on the
principle of using consistent terminology everywhere.
> unneccessary => unnecessary, spell check please.
>> + the uncontended cases and hence do not involve syscalls. Unlikely
>> + (contended case) paths usually will involve syscalls to wait or to wake.
>> +
>> + Much of this code takes a 'private' parameter. This may be:
>> + LLL_PRIVATE: lock only shared within a process
>> + LLL_SHARED: lock may be shared across processes. */
>> +
>> +/* The states of locks are:
>> + 0 - untaken
>> + 1 - taken (by one user)
>> + >1 - contended (taken by 1 user, there may be other users waiting)
>
> I don't think this is true, I think 2 is explicitly "locked, one or more waiters"
>
> Suggest:
>
> 0 - unlocked.
> 1 - locked, no waiters.
> 2 - locked, one or more waiters.
I did consider putting '2', but abandoned it because the checks are all for
>1 and I haven't proved that nothing in glibc is fiddling the values of
futexes to >2.
I think we can be in state >1 with no waiters - for example, when the final
waiter is woken.
To make the >1 state easier to refer to in comments I've gone for:
>1 - locked-with-waiters, there _may_ be waiters
If I'm right then strictly >1 means locked-possibly-with-waiters, but that's
really getting too much of a mouthful (as 'potentially contended' would have
been in the earlier terminology).
>> +
>> + cond_locks are never in the taken state, they are either untaken or
>> + contended.
>
> Please use locked, or unlocked terms everywhere.
I've gone for unlocked, locked and locked with waiters.
>
>> +/* If lock is 0 (untaken), set to 1 (taken). Return 0. Lock acquired.
>> + Otherwise lock is unchanged. Return nonzero. Lock not acquired. */
>
> Use GNU style variable name and value usage i.e. `lock` is the variable name,
> while `LOCK` is the value of `lock`. So you can say "If the value of lock is..."
> or "If LOCK is...".
>
> Suggest:
>
> If LOCK is 0 (unlocked), set to 1 (locked) and return 0 to indicate the
> lock was acquired, otherwise the lock is unchanged and return non-zero
> to indicate the lock was not acquired.
Split into two sentences, but basically used your suggestion.
>> #define lll_trylock(lock) \
>> atomic_compare_and_exchange_bool_acq (&(lock), 1, 0)
>>
>> +/* If lock is 0 (untaken), set to 2 (contended). Return 0. Lock acquired.
>> + Otherwise lock is unchanged. Return nonzero. Lock not acquired. */
>
> Please rewrite into full sentences.
Done.
>> +/* If futex is 0 (untaken), set to 1 (taken). Lock acquired.
>> + Otherwise, block until lock is acquired. After blocking, futex is 2
>> + (contended). */
>
> Please rewrite into full sentences.
Done.
>> #define __lll_lock(futex, private) \
>> ((void) \
>> ({ \
>> @@ -52,6 +87,11 @@ extern int __lll_robust_lock_wait (int *futex, int private) attribute_hidden;
>> __lll_lock (&(futex), private)
>>
>>
>> +/* If futex is 0 (untaken), set to id (taken). Return 0. Lock acquired.
>> + Otherwise, block until either:
>> + 1) Lock is acquired. Return 0. futex is id | FUTEX_WAITERS (contended).
>> + 2) Previous owner of futex dies. Return value of futex, which is id of
>> + dead owner with FUTEX_OWNER_DIED set. Lock not acquired. */
>
> Please rewrite into full sentences.
Done.
>> #define __lll_robust_lock(futex, id, private) \
>> ({ \
>> int *__futex = (futex); \
>> @@ -69,6 +109,12 @@ extern int __lll_robust_lock_wait (int *futex, int private) attribute_hidden;
>> /* This is an expression rather than a statement even though its value is
>> void, so that it can be used in a comma expression or as an expression
>> that's cast to void. */
>> +/* Unconditionally set futex to 2 (contended). cond locks only have
>> + untaken and contended states, so there is no need to check the value of
>> + futex before setting.
>> + If previous value of futex was 0 (untaken), lock is acquired.
>> + Otherwise, block until lock is acquired. futex will still be 2 (contended)
>> + after acquisition. */
>
> Please rewrite into full sentences.
>
Done.
>> #define __lll_cond_lock(futex, private) \
>> ((void) \
>> ({ \
>> @@ -79,6 +125,12 @@ extern int __lll_robust_lock_wait (int *futex, int private) attribute_hidden;
>> #define lll_cond_lock(futex, private) __lll_cond_lock (&(futex), private)
>>
>>
>> +/* If futex is 0 (untaken), set to id | FUTEX_WAITERS (contended). Lock
>> + acquired.
>> + Otherwise, block until either:
>> + 1) Lock is acquired. Return 0. futex is id | FUTEX_WAITERS (contended).
>> + 2) Previous owner of futex dies. Return the value of futex, which is id of
>> + dead owner with FUTEX_OWNER_DIED set. Lock not acquired. */
>
> Please rewrite into full sentences.
>
Done.
>> #define lll_robust_cond_lock(futex, id, private) \
>> __lll_robust_lock (&(futex), (id) | FUTEX_WAITERS, private)
>>
>> @@ -88,8 +140,7 @@ extern int __lll_timedlock_wait (int *futex, const struct timespec *,
>> extern int __lll_robust_timedlock_wait (int *futex, const struct timespec *,
>> int private) attribute_hidden;
>>
>> -/* Take futex if it is untaken.
>> - Otherwise block until either we get the futex or abstime runs out. */
>> +/* As __lll_lock, but with a timeout. */
>
> Can you comment on the return value of the futex if it times out?
>
Done.
>> #define __lll_timedlock(futex, abstime, private) \
>> ({ \
>> int *__futex = (futex); \
>> @@ -104,6 +155,7 @@ extern int __lll_robust_timedlock_wait (int *futex, const struct timespec *,
>> __lll_timedlock (&(futex), abstime, private)
>>
>>
>> +/* As __lll_robust_lock, but with a timeout. */
>
> Similarly.
>
Similarly done.
>> #define __lll_robust_timedlock(futex, abstime, id, private) \
>> ({ \
>> int *__futex = (futex); \
>> @@ -121,6 +173,9 @@ extern int __lll_robust_timedlock_wait (int *futex, const struct timespec *,
>> /* This is an expression rather than a statement even though its value is
>> void, so that it can be used in a comma expression or as an expression
>> that's cast to void. */
>> +/* Unconditionally set futex to 0 (untaken). Lock is released.
>> + If previous value of futex was > 1 (contended), wake any waiters. (Waiter
>> + that acquires the lock will set futex to >1 (contended).) */
>
> Please rewrite into full sentences.
>
Done.
>> #define __lll_unlock(futex, private) \
>> ((void) \
>> ({ \
>> @@ -132,10 +187,12 @@ extern int __lll_robust_timedlock_wait (int *futex, const struct timespec *,
>> #define lll_unlock(futex, private) \
>> __lll_unlock (&(futex), private)
>>
>> -
>> /* This is an expression rather than a statement even though its value is
>> void, so that it can be used in a comma expression or as an expression
>> that's cast to void. */
>> +/* Unconditionally set futex to 0 (untaken). Lock is released.
>> + If previous value of futex had FUTEX_WAITERS set, wake any waiters. (Waiter
>> + that acquires the lock will set FUTEX_WAITERS.) */
>
> Please rewrite into full sentences.
>
Done.
2014-09-26 Bernard Ogden <bernie.ogden@linaro.org>
* nptl/lowlevellock.c: Add comments.
* nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c: Likewise.
* sysdeps/nptl/lowlevellock.h: Likewise.
---
diff --git a/nptl/lowlevellock.c b/nptl/lowlevellock.c
index e198af7..c14b24a 100644
--- a/nptl/lowlevellock.c
+++ b/nptl/lowlevellock.c
@@ -27,10 +27,10 @@ void
__lll_lock_wait_private (int *futex)
{
if (*futex == 2)
- lll_futex_wait (futex, 2, LLL_PRIVATE);
+ lll_futex_wait (futex, 2, LLL_PRIVATE); /* Wait if *futex == 2. */
while (atomic_exchange_acq (futex, 2) != 0)
- lll_futex_wait (futex, 2, LLL_PRIVATE);
+ lll_futex_wait (futex, 2, LLL_PRIVATE); /* Wait if *futex == 2. */
}
@@ -40,10 +40,10 @@ void
__lll_lock_wait (int *futex, int private)
{
if (*futex == 2)
- lll_futex_wait (futex, 2, private);
+ lll_futex_wait (futex, 2, private); /* Wait if *futex == 2. */
while (atomic_exchange_acq (futex, 2) != 0)
- lll_futex_wait (futex, 2, private);
+ lll_futex_wait (futex, 2, private); /* Wait if *futex == 2. */
}
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ __lll_timedlock_wait (int *futex, const struct timespec *abstime, int private)
if (rt.tv_sec < 0)
return ETIMEDOUT;
- /* Wait. */
+ /* If *futex == 2, wait until woken or timeout. */
lll_futex_timed_wait (futex, 2, &rt, private);
}
@@ -83,6 +83,10 @@ __lll_timedlock_wait (int *futex, const struct timespec *abstime, int private)
}
+/* The kernel notifies a process which uses CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID via futex
+ wakeup when the clone terminates. The memory location contains the
+ thread ID while the clone is running and is reset to zero
+ afterwards. */
int
__lll_timedwait_tid (int *tidp, const struct timespec *abstime)
{
@@ -113,8 +117,10 @@ __lll_timedwait_tid (int *tidp, const struct timespec *abstime)
if (rt.tv_sec < 0)
return ETIMEDOUT;
- /* Wait until thread terminates. The kernel so far does not use
- the private futex operations for this. */
+ /* If *tidp == tid, wait until thread terminates or the wait times out.
+ The kernel to version 3.16.3 does not use the private futex
+ operations for futex wakeup when the clone terminates.
+ */
if (lll_futex_timed_wait (tidp, tid, &rt, LLL_SHARED) == -ETIMEDOUT)
return ETIMEDOUT;
}
diff --git a/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c b/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c
index 3525807..470fe00 100644
--- a/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c
+++ b/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c
@@ -36,14 +36,17 @@ __lll_robust_lock_wait (int *futex, int private)
do
{
+ /* If owner died, return the present value of the futex. */
if (__glibc_unlikely (oldval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED))
return oldval;
+ /* Attempt to put lock into state locked with waiters. */
int newval = oldval | FUTEX_WAITERS;
if (oldval != newval
&& atomic_compare_and_exchange_bool_acq (futex, newval, oldval))
continue;
+ /* If *futex == 2, wait until woken. */
lll_futex_wait (futex, newval, private);
try:
@@ -100,15 +103,17 @@ __lll_robust_timedlock_wait (int *futex, const struct timespec *abstime,
return ETIMEDOUT;
#endif
- /* Wait. */
+ /* If owner died, return the present value of the futex. */
if (__glibc_unlikely (oldval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED))
return oldval;
+ /* Attempt to put lock into state locked with waiters. */
int newval = oldval | FUTEX_WAITERS;
if (oldval != newval
&& atomic_compare_and_exchange_bool_acq (futex, newval, oldval))
continue;
+ /* If *futex == 2, wait until woken or timeout. */
#if (!defined __ASSUME_FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME \
|| !defined lll_futex_timed_wait_bitset)
lll_futex_timed_wait (futex, newval, &rt, private);
diff --git a/sysdeps/nptl/lowlevellock.h b/sysdeps/nptl/lowlevellock.h
index 28f4ba3..d8c9846 100644
--- a/sysdeps/nptl/lowlevellock.h
+++ b/sysdeps/nptl/lowlevellock.h
@@ -22,9 +22,40 @@
#include <atomic.h>
#include <lowlevellock-futex.h>
+/* Uses futexes to avoid unnecessary calls into the kernel. Likely paths are
+ the cases with no waiters and hence do not involve syscalls. Unlikely paths
+ usually will involve syscalls to wait or to wake.
+
+ Much of this code takes a 'private' parameter. This may be:
+ LLL_PRIVATE: lock only shared within a process
+ LLL_SHARED: lock may be shared across processes. */
+
+/* The states of locks are:
+ 0 - unlocked
+ 1 - locked, no waiters
+ >1 - locked with waiters, there _may_ be waiters
+
+ cond_locks are never in the locked state, they are either unlocked or
+ locked with waiters.
+
+ The states of robust locks are:
+ 0 - unlocked
+ id - locked (by user identified by id & FUTEX_TID_MASK)
+
+ The following flags may be set in the robust lock value:
+ FUTEX_WAITERS - locked with waiters (there _may_ be waiters)
+ FUTEX_OWNER_DIED - owning user has exited without releasing the futex. */
+
+
+/* If LOCK is 0 (unlocked), set to 1 (locked) and return 0 to indicate the
+ lock was acquired. Otherwise leave the lock unchanged and return non-zero
+ to indicate the lock was not acquired. */
#define lll_trylock(lock) \
atomic_compare_and_exchange_bool_acq (&(lock), 1, 0)
+/* If LOCK is 0 (unlocked), set to 2 (locked with waiters) and return 0 to
+ indicate the lock was acquired. Otherwise leave the lock unchanged and
+ return non-zero to indicate the lock was not acquired. */
#define lll_cond_trylock(lock) \
atomic_compare_and_exchange_bool_acq (&(lock), 2, 0)
@@ -35,6 +66,12 @@ extern int __lll_robust_lock_wait (int *futex, int private) attribute_hidden;
/* This is an expression rather than a statement even though its value is
void, so that it can be used in a comma expression or as an expression
that's cast to void. */
+/* The inner conditional compiles to a call to __lll_lock_wait_private if
+ private is known at compile time to be LLL_PRIVATE, and to a call to
+ __lll_lock_wait otherwise. */
+/* If FUTEX is 0 (unlocked), set to 1 (locked) and return. Otherwise block
+ until we acquire the lock, at which point FUTEX is 2 (locked with waiters),
+ then return. The lock is aways acquired on return. */
#define __lll_lock(futex, private) \
((void) \
({ \
@@ -52,6 +89,13 @@ extern int __lll_robust_lock_wait (int *futex, int private) attribute_hidden;
__lll_lock (&(futex), private)
+/* If FUTEX is 0 (unlocked), set to ID (locked) and return 0 to indicate the
+ lock was acquired. Otherwise, block until either:
+ 1) We acquire the lock, at which point FUTEX will be ID | FUTEX_WAITERS
+ (locked with waiters). Return 0 to indicate that the lock was acquired.
+ 2) The previous owner of the lock dies. FUTEX will be
+ ID | FUTEX_OWNER_DIED. FUTEX_WAITERS may also be set. Return FUTEX to
+ indicate that the lock is not acquired. */
#define __lll_robust_lock(futex, id, private) \
({ \
int *__futex = (futex); \
@@ -69,6 +113,12 @@ extern int __lll_robust_lock_wait (int *futex, int private) attribute_hidden;
/* This is an expression rather than a statement even though its value is
void, so that it can be used in a comma expression or as an expression
that's cast to void. */
+/* Unconditionally set FUTEX to 2 (locked with waiters). cond locks only have
+ unlocked and locked with waiters states, so there is no need to check FUTEX
+ before setting.
+ If FUTEX was 0 (unlocked) then return. Otherwise, block until the lock is
+ acquired, at which point FUTEX is 2 (locked with waiters). The lock is
+ always acquired on return. */
#define __lll_cond_lock(futex, private) \
((void) \
({ \
@@ -79,6 +129,14 @@ extern int __lll_robust_lock_wait (int *futex, int private) attribute_hidden;
#define lll_cond_lock(futex, private) __lll_cond_lock (&(futex), private)
+/* If FUTEX is 0 (unlocked), set to ID | FUTEX_WAITERS (locked with waiters)
+ and return, indicating that the lock is acquired. Otherwise, block until
+ either:
+ 1) We acquire the lock, at which point FUTEX will be ID | FUTEX_WAITERS
+ (locked with waiters), then return.
+ 2) The previous owner of the lock dies. FUTEX will be
+ ID | FUTEX_OWNER_DIED. FUTEX_WAITERS may also be set. Return FUTEX to
+ indicate that the lock is not acquired. */
#define lll_robust_cond_lock(futex, id, private) \
__lll_robust_lock (&(futex), (id) | FUTEX_WAITERS, private)
@@ -88,8 +146,8 @@ extern int __lll_timedlock_wait (int *futex, const struct timespec *,
extern int __lll_robust_timedlock_wait (int *futex, const struct timespec *,
int private) attribute_hidden;
-/* Take futex if it is untaken.
- Otherwise block until either we get the futex or abstime runs out. */
+/* As __lll_lock, but with a timeout. If the timeout occurs then return
+ ETIMEDOUT. If ABSTIME is invalid, return EINVAL. */
#define __lll_timedlock(futex, abstime, private) \
({ \
int *__futex = (futex); \
@@ -104,6 +162,8 @@ extern int __lll_robust_timedlock_wait (int *futex, const struct timespec *,
__lll_timedlock (&(futex), abstime, private)
+/* As __lll_robust_lock, but with a timeout. If the timeout occurs then return
+ ETIMEDOUT. If ABSTIME is invalid, return EINVAL. */
#define __lll_robust_timedlock(futex, abstime, id, private) \
({ \
int *__futex = (futex); \
@@ -121,6 +181,9 @@ extern int __lll_robust_timedlock_wait (int *futex, const struct timespec *,
/* This is an expression rather than a statement even though its value is
void, so that it can be used in a comma expression or as an expression
that's cast to void. */
+/* Unconditionally set FUTEX to 0 (unlocked), releasing the lock. If FUTEX was
+ >1 (locked with waiters) then wake any waiters. (The waiter who acquires
+ the lock will set FUTEX to >1.) */
#define __lll_unlock(futex, private) \
((void) \
({ \
@@ -132,10 +195,12 @@ extern int __lll_robust_timedlock_wait (int *futex, const struct timespec *,
#define lll_unlock(futex, private) \
__lll_unlock (&(futex), private)
-
/* This is an expression rather than a statement even though its value is
void, so that it can be used in a comma expression or as an expression
that's cast to void. */
+/* Unconditionally set FUTEX to 0 (unlocked), releasing the lock. If FUTEX had
+ FUTEX_WAITERS set then wake any waiters. (The waiter who acquires the lock
+ will set FUTEX_WAITERS.) */
#define __lll_robust_unlock(futex, private) \
((void) \
({ \
@@ -159,15 +224,11 @@ extern int __lll_robust_timedlock_wait (int *futex, const struct timespec *,
#define LLL_LOCK_INITIALIZER (0)
#define LLL_LOCK_INITIALIZER_LOCKED (1)
-/* The states of a lock are:
- 0 - untaken
- 1 - taken by one user
- >1 - taken by more users */
-
/* The kernel notifies a process which uses CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID via futex
wakeup when the clone terminates. The memory location contains the
thread ID while the clone is running and is reset to zero
- afterwards. */
+ afterwards. The kernel to version 3.16.3 does not use the private futex
+ operations for futex wakeup when the clone terminates. */
#define lll_wait_tid(tid) \
do { \
__typeof (tid) __tid; \
@@ -178,6 +239,8 @@ extern int __lll_robust_timedlock_wait (int *futex, const struct timespec *,
extern int __lll_timedwait_tid (int *, const struct timespec *)
attribute_hidden;
+/* As lll_wait_tid, but with a timeout. If the timeout occurs then return
+ ETIMEDOUT. If ABSTIME is invalid, return EINVAL. */
#define lll_timedwait_tid(tid, abstime) \
({ \
int __res = 0; \