This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Mon 04 Aug 2014 15:51:15 Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Sat, 2 Aug 2014, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > right, posix_openpt is part of libc, but shm_open is part of librt. so > > the > > former should use __statfs64 to avoid the PLT while the latter should use > > statfs64. > > No, both should use __statfs64 as statfs64 is not part of the POSIX > namespace but shm_open is. As previously discussed, PLT avoidance and > being namespace-clean are separate issues. why does that matter ? statfs64 is always exported by libc and thus is in the visible ABI namespace. i don't see why glibc's internals need to be concerned with conforming to POSIX at all -- they're internals. what are you trying to cater to ? -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |