This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Distributions still suffering from s390 ABI change problems.


On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:42:58AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> The SO name bump case should be looked at with serious
> consideration.

Instead, why not just revert the breakage and have IBM look at another
way to implement this that does not break the ABI?  I understand that
this essentially is breaking ABI again, but it might be better than
bumping soname since that makes it three ABIs instead of two.

That is, with a soname bump you have:

- The original ABI
- The broken 2.19 ABI
- The soname bumped ABI

with a revert you have:

- The original ABI before the patch and after reverting
- The broken 2.19 ABI

Siddhesh

Attachment: pgpD4GjpTEudx.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]