This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:42:58AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > The SO name bump case should be looked at with serious > consideration. Instead, why not just revert the breakage and have IBM look at another way to implement this that does not break the ABI? I understand that this essentially is breaking ABI again, but it might be better than bumping soname since that makes it three ABIs instead of two. That is, with a soname bump you have: - The original ABI - The broken 2.19 ABI - The soname bumped ABI with a revert you have: - The original ABI before the patch and after reverting - The broken 2.19 ABI Siddhesh
Attachment:
pgpD4GjpTEudx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |