This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

[PATCH] Add NI_NUMERICSCOPE support to getnameinfo

From: Rich Felker <dalias at aerifal dot cx>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 18:44:23 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Add NI_NUMERICSCOPE support to getnameinfo
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <20121014220643 dot GA17229 at brightrain dot aerifal dot cx> <20140604025109 dot GL507 at brightrain dot aerifal dot cx> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1406192211300 dot 2033 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk>

On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:13:11PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Rich Felker wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 06:06:43PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > > See bug #14102: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14102
> > > 
> > > Even if nobody is willing to add the functionality immediately, can we
> > > at least agree on a value it will have when it's added?
> > 
> > This issue is really trivial and I've been waiting for someone to
> > address it for almost 2 years now. Is the attached patch acceptable?
> 
> You need to explain why you think ignoring the flag is a valid 
> implementation (or that defining it without implementing it is more 
> helpful to applications, or better accords with established glibc 
> conventions, than not defining it until there is an implementation).

Trivial patch attached.

Rich

Attachment: ni_numericscope.diff
Description: Text document

References:
- Re: Please address NI_NUMERICSCOPE issue
  - From: Rich Felker
- Re: Please address NI_NUMERICSCOPE issue
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]