This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: gold vs libc
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>, "GNU C. Library" <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 14:28:01 -0400
- Subject: Re: gold vs libc
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20140330042516 dot 1A88E74481 at topped-with-meat dot com>
On 03/30/2014 12:25 AM, Roland McGrath wrote:
> On the glibc.git branch roland/gold-vs-libc is the trivial configure change
> necessary to let glibc attempt to build using gold as the linker. (The
> version check with that change is excessively loose--to boot, it admits
> current gold versions so you can test, even though they don't work enough.)
Enabling gold is BZ #14995.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14995
... and to link to the old discussion with more patches for
configure:
https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-01/msg00274.html
Cheres,
Carlos.