This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Moving ports architectures to libc?
- From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 23:04:11 +0530
- Subject: Re: Moving ports architectures to libc?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1401212254020 dot 25161 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1401250256210 dot 16529 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <20140127040439 dot GB2149 at spoyarek dot pnq dot redhat dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1401271806180 dot 8452 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <20140128042927 dot GG2149 at spoyarek dot pnq dot redhat dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1401281721230 dot 30131 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk>
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 05:22:10PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> Do you then agree with moving bugs for ports architectures to components
> such as "libc" and "math" when those architectures move out of ports (and
> ensuring the bugs are appropriate tagged)?
Yes.
Siddhesh