This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [MTASCsft PATCH WIP6 01/33] MT-, AS- and AC-Safety docs


On Jan 22, 2014, "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:

> That's fine except that `@item\nText' still gives a bullet without any
> text beside it and that confusingly looks like missing text.
 
Err...  After the initial change, I see text right next to the bullets
in info, pdf and html outputs.  Do you still see stand-alone bullets?


>> Some clarity, I think.  Instead of having to define each instance of
>> âidâ, we'd have a general pattern governing all such âidâs, wherein
>> race:id would suggest the need for an exclusive/write lock to make the
>> function safe, whereas ro:id would indicate âidâ is expected to be
>> read-only, but if any modifiers are called (while holding an exclusive
>> lock), then ro:id-marked functions ought to be guarded with a read lock
>> for safe operation.  ro:env or ro:locale, for example, seems to convey
>> more clearly the expectations and the meaning, than just env or locale.

> Add this to the comment :-)
 
Done


>> Functions that allocate or deallocate file descriptors will generally be
>> marked as such.  Even if they attempted to protect the file descriptor
>> allocation and deallocation with cleanup regions, allocating a new
>> descriptor and storing its number where the cleanup region could release
>> it cannot be performed as a single atomic operation.  Similarly,
>> releasing the descriptor and taking it out of the data structure
>> normally responsible for releasing it cannot be performed atomically.
>> There will always be a window in which the descriptor cannot be released
>> because it was not stored in the cleanup handler argument yet, or in
>> which it was already taken out before releasing it in the normal flow.

> s/in which//g

Please confirm â...window the descriptor...â; it doesn't seem to parse
correctly to me.


> I like "!posix" :-)
 
You got it ;-)

-- 
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter    http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/   FSF Latin America board member
Free Software Evangelist     Red Hat Brazil Toolchain Engineer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]