This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH][v3] Add AARCH64 relocation constants to elf/elf.h
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
- To: "Ryan S. Arnold" <ryan dot arnold at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Petr Machata <pmachata at redhat dot com>, libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:11:58 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH][v3] Add AARCH64 relocation constants to elf/elf.h
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <m2wqmyb0lb dot fsf at redhat dot com> <m27gem5cz5 dot fsf at redhat dot com> <CAAKybw-KUEn5_0fbHZCWn8cinjVA-n4PnH3G0vqgfqbmyy4dVw at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Ryan S. Arnold <ryan.arnold@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Petr Machata <pmachata@redhat.com> wrote:
>> PING
>>
>> The patch is at
>> http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-09/msg00075.html
>>
>> Thanks,
>> PM
>
> Hi Petr,
>
> I assume this is congruent with the relocation definitions/usage in
> binutils and gold?
>
> Are all parties that are invested in the architecture using these
> relocations? From experience, you don't want to have relocation
> number assignment overlaps with other competing implementations
> (compilers and tools) if at all possible.
These numbers are part of the official AARCH64 ABI SPEC on ARM's
website. So yes they are the same definitions/usage there.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
>
> Ryan S. Arnold