This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PowerPC floating point little-endian [2 of 15]


On 08/09/2013 08:20 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> On 08/09/2013 06:39 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
>> diff --git a/sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm/e_acoshl.c b/sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm/e_acoshl.c
>> index abc78a3..8a4a5bb 100644
>> --- a/sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm/e_acoshl.c
>> +++ b/sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm/e_acoshl.c
>> @@ -36,8 +36,12 @@ __ieee754_acoshl(long double x)
>>  {
>>  	long double t;
>>  	int64_t hx;
>> -	u_int64_t lx;
>> -	GET_LDOUBLE_WORDS64(hx,lx,x);
>> +	uint64_t lx;
>> +	double xhi, xlo;
>> +
>> +	ldbl_unpack (x, &xhi, &xlo);
>> +	EXTRACT_WORDS64 (hx, xhi);
>> +	EXTRACT_WORDS64 (lx, xlo);
>>  	if(hx<0x3ff0000000000000LL) {		/* x < 1 */
>>  	    return (x-x)/(x-x);
>>  	} else if(hx >=0x41b0000000000000LL) {	/* x > 2**28 */
> 
> Alan, you're replacing GET_LDOUBLE_WORDS64 with ldlb_unpack,
> EXTRACT_WORDS64;EXTRACT_WORDS64 - why can't you just change the macro
> GET_LDOUBLE_WORDS64 to do the right thing?
> 
> The change itself looks fine, I just wonder why you did it this way,

Ignore my comment, I understand this now.
I should have reread the rest of your emails first.

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]