This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [RFC] Automatic nightly builds?
- From: OndÅej BÃlka <neleai at seznam dot cz>
- To: Marek Polacek <polacek at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Marcus Shawcroft <marcus dot shawcroft at linaro dot org>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, Thomas Schwinge <thomas at codesourcery dot com>, Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>, Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>, Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf at tilera dot com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
- Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 15:15:38 +0200
- Subject: Re: [RFC] Automatic nightly builds?
- References: <51E5C427 dot 60304 at redhat dot com> <20130720095751 dot GA7273 at domone> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1307201155550 dot 3231 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <20130720123228 dot GJ3169 at redhat dot com>
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 02:32:28PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 11:58:15AM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > Diffs in .out files are not reliable indications of changes to testsuite
> > failures. Instead, we should get in some version of Tomas Dohnalek's
> > patch to log PASS / FAIL results for individual tests. At that point, you
> > have something for which comparisons are reasonably reliable and useful,
> > even if not perfect.
>
> Agreed. Note, Tomas left Red Hat a while ago, he won't finish that
> PASS / FAIL patch; someone else ought to pick it up.
>
OK, .out diffs were my first guess. Until PASS/FAIL is ready we could
use
make -k check 2> errors
grep Error errors
to get failures and diff them, couldn't we?
> Marek