This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH 2/2 v5] [BZ #10283] localedef: align fixed maps to SHMLBA
- From: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
- To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- Cc: David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>, vapier at gentoo dot org, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v5] [BZ #10283] localedef: align fixed maps to SHMLBA
- References: <20130619230242 dot 99D1D2C111 at topped-with-meat dot com> <20130619 dot 160945 dot 351998924661893149 dot davem at davemloft dot net> <20130619232341 dot A9C462C111 at topped-with-meat dot com> <20130619 dot 164631 dot 2015669758604184036 dot davem at davemloft dot net> <20130619235754 dot 18D332C111 at topped-with-meat dot com> <51C25826 dot 3010901 at redhat dot com>
> You can still be right, but if everyone disagrees with you, and
> you're unwilling to work towards a consensus, then the patch is
> going to get checked in without your consent.
I have a hard time imagining what I've done or said that would constitute
being "unwilling to work towards a consensus". Please explain.
In this case, the difference between the last patch Mike posted and what I
said I'd be happy with is almost trivial. If Mike's patch goes in as is,
then it will take me just a few minutes to clean it up as I asked him to
do, and I'll just do that. Given this reality, Mike's, Dave's, and your
recalcitrance seems a lot closer to "unwilling to work towards a consensus"
than my position in every regard except popularity.
Thanks,
Roland