This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: How are we doing with our blockers for 2.18?
- From: "Ryan S. Arnold" <ryan dot arnold at gmail dot com>
- To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>, Andi Kleen <andi at firstfloor dot org>, Ryan Arnold <rsa at us dot ibm dot com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:39:43 -0500
- Subject: Re: How are we doing with our blockers for 2.18?
- References: <51BB768B dot 8010204 at redhat dot com>
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
> Community,
>
> How are we doing with our 2.18 blockers?
The Power8 patches depends on AT_HWCAP2 as is, but I suppose I could
separate the platform enablement from the power8 hwcap bits. That
would still get the power8 arch stuff in place by Monday. in the
meantime I'll look at the implications of AT_HWCAP w/rt the
pseudo-hwcap bits.
Ryan