This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Tracking patch pings
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>
- Cc: siddhesh at redhat dot com, vapier at gentoo dot org, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 11:48:44 -0400
- Subject: Re: Tracking patch pings
- References: <201305151728 dot 04922 dot vapier at gentoo dot org> <201306020337 dot 43464 dot vapier at gentoo dot org> <20130603031701 dot GW2145 at spoyarek dot pnq dot redhat dot com> <20130602 dot 202717 dot 1841334694696745593 dot davem at davemloft dot net>
On 06/02/2013 11:27 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@redhat.com>
> Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 08:47:01 +0530
>
>> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 03:37:42AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>>> looks like they're handling gcc-patches already. and they have the
>>>> infrastructure. all we have to do is ask them to turn it on and see how it
>>>> goes ? :)
>>>
>>> i've started a conversation with them for creating a glibc project. two
>>> questions:
>>> - do we want to merge the patches in libc-alpha and libc-ports into a single
>>> glibc project ? or do we want the patch tracker to also be two sep projects ?
>>
>> My opinion is that it should be a single project.
>
> I agree.
>
+1.
c.