This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH][BZ #15533] Avoid unnecessary slowdown from profiling with audit
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: Alexander Monakov <amonakov at ispras dot ru>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 10:15:01 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH][BZ #15533] Avoid unnecessary slowdown from profiling with audit
- References: <alpine dot LNX dot 2 dot 00 dot 1305250406320 dot 23866 at monopod dot intra dot ispras dot ru> <51A57112 dot 7080004 at redhat dot com> <alpine dot LNX dot 2 dot 00 dot 1305291356590 dot 2647 at monopod dot intra dot ispras dot ru>
On 05/29/2013 06:21 AM, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Tue, 28 May 2013, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>
>> GCC copyright assignment does not cover glibc.
>
> Hm, indeed, sorry. I was under an impression that completing the assignment
> process once is always sufficient.
>
>> Are you able to get a copyright assignment for glibc?
>
> Technically yes. I expect it will take a lot of time though.
>
> Given the triviality of the matter, if committing that patch is absolutely
> predicated on me filing the papers, would anyone be willing to author and
> check in an alternative fix? That would simplify matters a lot (I realize I
> will need to eventually submit papers for future changes).
Checking in the fix should be possible, the change is small,
logically simple, and as I said before it *borders* on legally
significant.
However, this would be the last change we would be able to accept
from you. Future changes would require copyright assignment.
We would be more than happy to have future changes from you, but
you need copyright assignment.
Does that make sense to you?
Cheers,
Carlos.