This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Tracking patch pings
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot com>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 16:48:54 -0400
- Subject: Re: Tracking patch pings
- References: <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1305152117141 dot 21321 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <51948AF9 dot 7020702 at suse dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1305161257580 dot 9498 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <5194F0A6 dot 9030500 at suse dot com>
On 05/16/2013 10:43 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> On 05/16/2013 03:14 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 May 2013, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>
>>> My impression is that we have a couple of patches that get pinged but it's not
>>> such a large number that we need an automated tool and something low tech like
>>> a wiki page would be a good start - and it would tell us more about the size
>>> of the problem.
>>
>> Looking just at <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-05/threads.html>
>> I see patches/pings from this month arguably pending review:
>
> Thanks for the list, this is worse than I thought,
With glibc it's almost always worse than you think ;-)
c.